$Imagine requesting ChatGPT to create a portfolio worth $1.2 million … and then actually implementing it. That's precisely what one of our listeners thought about doing. She employed AI to craft her entire allocation and then called into the Afford Anything podcast to inquire: “How did the robot perform? What modifications would you suggest?” In a recent episode, Joe and I analyzed her strategy — identifying what’s robust, what’s questionable, and what we’d alter if it were our investment. (Spoiler alert: her "spicy" 6% allocation to Cathie Wood’s Ark funds ignited intense discussion.) Joe vs. Robot However, there are certain insights ChatGPT can’t convey: when to maintain a position, when to rebalance, and when to disregard external distractions. Investing isn’t solely about calculations. It involves psychology — knowing which trade-offs align with your objectives, rather than merely what appears appealing on paper. It requires an understanding of the distinction between “growth” and “income,” and between “investment” and “consumption.” An algorithm can process data, but it can’t navigate the complex, human aspects of wealth building. Watch Episode #641: ChatGPT Built Her $1.2M Portfolio … But Should She Trust It? This listener's question made me ponder: if AI finds it challenging to grasp the nuanced, psychological dimensions of stock investing — one of the most standardized, liquid, and well-documented asset categories — then how much more complicated is it when the stakes involve something tangible, illiquid, and profoundly personal? Like real estate. With stocks, you purchase fractional shares of companies. Transactions can be executed instantly, with no need to speak to anyone else. You can apply dollar-cost averaging gradually. As a stock investor, a company’s financial data is publicly available, the information is clear and well-regulated, and reporting standards are uniform. The entire system is designed to be accessible to the general public. There’s a wealth of information available about stocks, and millions of individuals are engaging in the same activities as you. Real estate, on the other hand, is vastly different. Each property is unique — differing in age, condition, and location. Every market exhibits its own peculiarities — at both the regional and local levels, as well as within specific neighborhoods. You’re committing a significant amount of money to a single asset — and selling it isn’t as simple as clicking a button. There’s no equivalent of a Robinhood app for real estate (thankfully — can you imagine?!). Furthermore, your analysis extends beyond numbers; you’re providing homes and managing all that comes with it. You’ll be vetting applications, overseeing tenants, making repairs, deciding on renovations, and determining whether to increase the rent at lease renewal. Each of these decisions impacts the lives of real individuals. If ChatGPT struggles to capture the psychological subtleties of stock investing — where decisions are relatively straightforward and standardized — then it certainly cannot navigate the emotional, complex, and heavily judgment-based realities of owning rental properties. (“Judgment-heavy” refers to exercising your best judgment, not to be confused with being judged by others, although that might also be a reality.) This highlights why real human experience is valuable. Having a guiding set of principles to inform your decision-making is important. Learning from a community of individuals who have faced similar situations matters. AI can generate cap rate formulas and cash flow forecasts. However, it can’t inform you about: - The feeling of screening your first tenant and trusting your instincts when something seems amiss - Whether that vacation rental is genuinely an investment or merely a lifestyle purchase you're trying to rationalize - If you are truly prepared to exchange liquidity for long-term cash flow - How to manage a bathroom emergency at 10 PM when your tenant is in distress In summary, it cannot guide you in exercising judgment, discernment, and wisdom. Real estate involves more than just crunching numbers; it requires developing the judgment to recognize when a property is viable and having the confidence to walk away when it isn’t. Did you find this article enjoyable and want to explore more investing topics? Click here.$

Imagine requesting ChatGPT to create a portfolio worth $1.2 million … and then actually implementing it. That's precisely what one of our listeners thought about doing. She employed AI to craft her entire allocation and then called into the Afford Anything podcast to inquire: “How did the robot perform? What modifications would you suggest?” In a recent episode, Joe and I analyzed her strategy — identifying what’s robust, what’s questionable, and what we’d alter if it were our investment. (Spoiler alert: her "spicy" 6% allocation to Cathie Wood’s Ark funds ignited intense discussion.) Joe vs. Robot However, there are certain insights ChatGPT can’t convey: when to maintain a position, when to rebalance, and when to disregard external distractions. Investing isn’t solely about calculations. It involves psychology — knowing which trade-offs align with your objectives, rather than merely what appears appealing on paper. It requires an understanding of the distinction between “growth” and “income,” and between “investment” and “consumption.” An algorithm can process data, but it can’t navigate the complex, human aspects of wealth building. Watch Episode #641: ChatGPT Built Her $1.2M Portfolio … But Should She Trust It? This listener's question made me ponder: if AI finds it challenging to grasp the nuanced, psychological dimensions of stock investing — one of the most standardized, liquid, and well-documented asset categories — then how much more complicated is it when the stakes involve something tangible, illiquid, and profoundly personal? Like real estate. With stocks, you purchase fractional shares of companies. Transactions can be executed instantly, with no need to speak to anyone else. You can apply dollar-cost averaging gradually. As a stock investor, a company’s financial data is publicly available, the information is clear and well-regulated, and reporting standards are uniform. The entire system is designed to be accessible to the general public. There’s a wealth of information available about stocks, and millions of individuals are engaging in the same activities as you. Real estate, on the other hand, is vastly different. Each property is unique — differing in age, condition, and location. Every market exhibits its own peculiarities — at both the regional and local levels, as well as within specific neighborhoods. You’re committing a significant amount of money to a single asset — and selling it isn’t as simple as clicking a button. There’s no equivalent of a Robinhood app for real estate (thankfully — can you imagine?!). Furthermore, your analysis extends beyond numbers; you’re providing homes and managing all that comes with it. You’ll be vetting applications, overseeing tenants, making repairs, deciding on renovations, and determining whether to increase the rent at lease renewal. Each of these decisions impacts the lives of real individuals. If ChatGPT struggles to capture the psychological subtleties of stock investing — where decisions are relatively straightforward and standardized — then it certainly cannot navigate the emotional, complex, and heavily judgment-based realities of owning rental properties. (“Judgment-heavy” refers to exercising your best judgment, not to be confused with being judged by others, although that might also be a reality.) This highlights why real human experience is valuable. Having a guiding set of principles to inform your decision-making is important. Learning from a community of individuals who have faced similar situations matters. AI can generate cap rate formulas and cash flow forecasts. However, it can’t inform you about: - The feeling of screening your first tenant and trusting your instincts when something seems amiss - Whether that vacation rental is genuinely an investment or merely a lifestyle purchase you're trying to rationalize - If you are truly prepared to exchange liquidity for long-term cash flow - How to manage a bathroom emergency at 10 PM when your tenant is in distress In summary, it cannot guide you in exercising judgment, discernment, and wisdom. Real estate involves more than just crunching numbers; it requires developing the judgment to recognize when a property is viable and having the confidence to walk away when it isn’t. Did you find this article enjoyable and want to explore more investing topics? Click here.

      Many individuals who achieve CoastFI find themselves in an unusual position: financially independent enough to cease saving, yet not entirely prepared to retire. If you’re relying on a taxable brokerage for decades, does the guideline of “never hold bonds in taxable” still hold true?

      This episode delves into the intersection of traditional asset location strategies and real-life expenditure. We explore how to strike a balance between growth, taxes, and stability when your taxable account serves as your income source. We also address two additional listener queries: assisting a parent in retirement through shared homeownership, and employing covered call strategies to generate income from a portfolio heavy in stocks.

      Listener Questions in This Episode

      Brandon (1:28): “I’m at CoastFI and will be withdrawing from my taxable account for the next 20 years. Should I include bonds in taxable, or keep everything in stocks?”

      Brandon’s retirement accounts can appreciate without withdrawals, but his taxable brokerage will support two decades of living costs. The conventional advice discourages bonds in taxable accounts, yet Paula clarifies why this isn’t a one-size-fits-all recommendation. When your taxable account finances your lifestyle, it must function as a cohesive portfolio. We discuss how to manage risk, prioritize liquidity, and plan your transition into CoastFI life.

      Andrew (21:26): “My spouse and I co-own a house with my mother-in-law. How can we assist her in retirement without causing family conflict?”

      We investigate equitable, flexible methods to support an aging parent without straining relationships. Paula details how to create a mutually beneficial arrangement and the role of seller financing in ensuring cash flow and peace of mind.

      Chandan (59:24): “Can covered-call ETFs help me earn income from my stock portfolio and RSUs?”

      We elucidate how covered calls operate, clarify what “covered” means, and discuss the trade-off between consistent income and limited potential gains. For individuals with concentrated stock holdings, Paula indicates when covered calls are advantageous—and when simpler alternatives may be preferable.

      Key Takeaways

      The rule of “no bonds in taxable” isn’t absolute. When relying exclusively on taxable accounts for years, that account must act as its own mini-portfolio, including bonds or cash for stability.

      Asset location is dictated by purpose, not strict rules. While tax efficiency is important, liquidity and risk management are paramount when the account supports your life.

      Consider the use of buckets. Your retirement accounts can focus on growth while your taxable account provides the stability required for spending.

      Prepare for rebalancing. When taxable account balances decrease, understand how and when to draw from other sources to maintain your bond/cash allocation and uphold your glidepath.

      The shift to CoastFI is a mental transition. You’re no longer focused solely on maximizing returns; instead, you’re working towards achieving peace of mind and steady withdrawals.

      Chapters

      Note: Timestamps are approximate and may vary across listening platforms due to dynamically inserted ads.

      (0:00) Introduction and summary of listener inquiries

      (1:28) Brandon’s CoastFI inquiry: bonds in taxable when withdrawals commence

      (3:56) Understanding why “no bonds in taxable” is more of a guideline than a rule

      (12:42) Treating taxable accounts as independent portfolios

      (18:31) Weighing tax efficiency against cash-flow necessities

      (25:26) Assisting a parent’s retirement through shared property ownership

      (67:24) Simplified explanation of covered calls, providing income with a limit

      Resources & Links

      Asset Location Cheat Sheet (free): affordanything.com/assetlocation

      Guide to Double-I FIRE (free): affordanything.com/fiire

      Thanks to our sponsors!

      Policy Genius

      Secure your family’s future with Policygenius. Visit policygenius.com to compare life insurance quotes from leading providers and find out how much you could save.

      MasterClass

      With MasterClass, learn from the best to optimize your own skills. Enjoy 15% off any annual membership at MasterClass.com/afford.

      Shopify

      Start your one-month trial for just one dollar and begin selling today at shopify.com/paula

      Indeed

      If you’re searching for exceptional talent to enhance your team, you need Indeed. Go to indeed.com/paula and begin hiring with a $75 sponsored job credit.

      Wayfair

      Get organized, refreshed, and prepared for the holidays at a great value. Visit wayfair.com now to shop for everything home-related.

Imagine requesting ChatGPT to create a portfolio worth $1.2 million … and then actually implementing it. That's precisely what one of our listeners thought about doing. She employed AI to craft her entire allocation and then called into the Afford Anything podcast to inquire: “How did the robot perform? What modifications would you suggest?” In a recent episode, Joe and I analyzed her strategy — identifying what’s robust, what’s questionable, and what we’d alter if it were our investment. (Spoiler alert: her "spicy" 6% allocation to Cathie Wood’s Ark funds ignited intense discussion.) Joe vs. Robot However, there are certain insights ChatGPT can’t convey: when to maintain a position, when to rebalance, and when to disregard external distractions. Investing isn’t solely about calculations. It involves psychology — knowing which trade-offs align with your objectives, rather than merely what appears appealing on paper. It requires an understanding of the distinction between “growth” and “income,” and between “investment” and “consumption.” An algorithm can process data, but it can’t navigate the complex, human aspects of wealth building. Watch Episode #641: ChatGPT Built Her $1.2M Portfolio … But Should She Trust It? This listener's question made me ponder: if AI finds it challenging to grasp the nuanced, psychological dimensions of stock investing — one of the most standardized, liquid, and well-documented asset categories — then how much more complicated is it when the stakes involve something tangible, illiquid, and profoundly personal? Like real estate. With stocks, you purchase fractional shares of companies. Transactions can be executed instantly, with no need to speak to anyone else. You can apply dollar-cost averaging gradually. As a stock investor, a company’s financial data is publicly available, the information is clear and well-regulated, and reporting standards are uniform. The entire system is designed to be accessible to the general public. There’s a wealth of information available about stocks, and millions of individuals are engaging in the same activities as you. Real estate, on the other hand, is vastly different. Each property is unique — differing in age, condition, and location. Every market exhibits its own peculiarities — at both the regional and local levels, as well as within specific neighborhoods. You’re committing a significant amount of money to a single asset — and selling it isn’t as simple as clicking a button. There’s no equivalent of a Robinhood app for real estate (thankfully — can you imagine?!). Furthermore, your analysis extends beyond numbers; you’re providing homes and managing all that comes with it. You’ll be vetting applications, overseeing tenants, making repairs, deciding on renovations, and determining whether to increase the rent at lease renewal. Each of these decisions impacts the lives of real individuals. If ChatGPT struggles to capture the psychological subtleties of stock investing — where decisions are relatively straightforward and standardized — then it certainly cannot navigate the emotional, complex, and heavily judgment-based realities of owning rental properties. (“Judgment-heavy” refers to exercising your best judgment, not to be confused with being judged by others, although that might also be a reality.) This highlights why real human experience is valuable. Having a guiding set of principles to inform your decision-making is important. Learning from a community of individuals who have faced similar situations matters. AI can generate cap rate formulas and cash flow forecasts. However, it can’t inform you about: - The feeling of screening your first tenant and trusting your instincts when something seems amiss - Whether that vacation rental is genuinely an investment or merely a lifestyle purchase you're trying to rationalize - If you are truly prepared to exchange liquidity for long-term cash flow - How to manage a bathroom emergency at 10 PM when your tenant is in distress In summary, it cannot guide you in exercising judgment, discernment, and wisdom. Real estate involves more than just crunching numbers; it requires developing the judgment to recognize when a property is viable and having the confidence to walk away when it isn’t. Did you find this article enjoyable and want to explore more investing topics? Click here.

Explore retirement strategies that defy traditional norms, combine growth with tranquility, and enable your finances to operate more efficiently in CoastFI living.

Other articles

What ChatGPT Did Well (and What It Didn't)